Freedom of speech is a commodity mostly taken for granted in the Western World. Yet there are abuses of this free speech, causing pain to others. Ursinus College recently had one such experience.
When it comes to chalking, there are certain standards one must adhere to. Opinions may be shared via speech or chalking, but not to cause harm to others. When the GSA chalked pro-gay rights sayings in Olin courtyard, they did not mean to offend or take issue with anyone’s views or beliefs. They were merely encouraging gays to stand up for their beliefs. When “God loves gays!” was chalked up, some other people took issue with this saying and replied “God hates Fags!” What the original message meant, I think, was that religion should not make a difference in this homosexual or heterosexual decision. It is up to the individual. The reply, however, seems to attack a view point directly; there is not love or understanding in a phrase like that; there is no tolerance or acceptance. That is where the line lays.
The line for what should be erased and what should not lays in the intentions behind the words. Encouraging people to “come out” are words of help, kindness and tolerance, not meant to offend or anger anyone; a view many people share. The second chalking is angry and are fighting words. However, there is a happy medium. If the GSA and people of accepting beliefs are allowed to express their opinion, then to quote from the Bible is another person’s opinion. To express one’s views parallel to the views out there now is OK. I do not believe the Leviticus quote was meant to inspire anger, it was meant to express another perspective.
Yet the bottom line requires both sides to talk, and share their feelings and beliefs. Hate speech should be subdued because of the message it portrays, but if a belief is merely being shared, then it should be allowed. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but displaying them is not always necessary.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment